Showing posts with label bilingualism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bilingualism. Show all posts

Wednesday, May 18, 2016

Welcome to Britistan - Urdu signs in Bradford, UK

Ah to be in England now that spring is here! Among the greenery sprouting along the highways and byways of the Septic Isle are some highway directional signs telling people where to go in two (count `em, 2) languages -- English and Urdu. Here's a pic.


Urdu (in case you didn't know) is the main language of Pakistan. Why is it now seen on British street signs? Because Pakistanis are now the majority in the Leeds-Bradford conurbation -- I've seen it with my own eyes -- but cannot or will not read English, so the local council has "accommodated" them by erecting signs in their own language.

After a series of accidents involving the Muslim colonizers, Mohammed Amin al Husseini, Bradford's Grand Mufti, complained that English-only road signs were putting Urdu speakers at unnecessary risk. The signs have cost more than £100,000, but hey, it's worth it! According to a report on The New Observer site, "the bilingual road signs have proven successful and a larger roll-out of signage across multicultural cities and towns across West Yorkshire and the North West has been approved and is expected to be implemented in early 2017." Here's another one.


The New Observer comments: "The advent of Urdu street signage in Yorkshire is another indication of the full extent of the ongoing non-white colonization of Britain which has been encouraged and supported by successive Labour and Conservative Party governments over a matter of decades." Indeed. But, Walt adds, this sort of thing doesn't happen only on the eastern side of the Atlantic. The misgovernments of the USA and Canada are also keen on promoting multiculturalism and "celebrating diversity". Bilingual/multilingual signs... coming soon to a neighbourhood near you... nearer than you think!

Footnote: Isn't it delicious to see "Little Germany" written in English and Urdu... but not in German?!

Further reading: "London Cockneys being exterminated", The New Observer 14/5/16. London’s world-famous cockneys -- once an iconic symbol of Britain -- have been exterminated by the flood of nonwhite immigration into the UK, a new documentary by the BBC has admitted. The documentary, titled "Last Whites of the East End", will be broadcast by the BBC on May 24th. It will show that the traditional Cockney district of East London now "looks like Baghdad".

Monday, November 23, 2015

A true (and ridiculous) Canadian story of political correctness

Nowhere -- repeat: NOWHERE -- is political correctness more firmly entrenched than in the Great No-longer-white North. Everything has to be done by the book: The Little Red Book of Diversity and Sensitivity (Queen's Printer, 1/4/15). The latest sin the PC police are trying to stamp out is "cultural appropriation".

Not quite the same as "cultural insensitivity", it seems to mean being so keen on some other ethnic/religious group's culture that you take it for your own. Many examples were found on Hallowe'en. White parents were instructed, for example, that it was "inappropriate" to send their kids out trick-or-treating dressed as Indians. [Hey! "First Nations"! Ed.] And one of the newly-minted Liberal cabinet ministers was pilloried in the meeja for having donned a coolie hat and gone to a Hallowe'en party as a Chinese. She was obliged to take "offensive" photos off her FB page.

And now for today's news from the battle against cultural insensitivity. At the resolutely bilingual University of Ottawa/Université d'Ottawa, a free class in yoga which had been given for seven years at the university's Centre for Students with Disabilities was no longer offered this fall because some students and volunteers were "uncomfortable with the 'cultural issues' involved."

Yesterday, The lead instructor, Jen Scharf, told CBC News, "I guess it was this cultural appropriation issue because yoga originally comes from India. I told them, 'Why don't we just change the name of the course?' It's simple enough, just call it 'mindful stretching'.... We're not going through the finer points of scripture. We're talking about basic physical awareness and how to stretch so that you feel good.

"That went back and forth.... The higher-ups at the student federation got involved, finally we got an email routed through the student federation basically saying they couldn't get a French name and nobody wants to do it, so we're going to cancel it for now."

You couldn't make this stuff up, could you. Anyone who can come up with a suitable name en français is invited to send it to Walt at the usual address, for forwarding to the U of 0, as many Canadians call the ultra-PC institution of higher learning.

Friday, July 3, 2015

Strange Canuck road signs baffle American tourist

Ty Burr is the film critic for the venerable Boston Globe. He is also a sometime visitor to Canada, whence he has just returned after spending some time "car camping" with his wife near the coast of New Brunswick.

He began his column yesterday, headed "Do you speak Canadian road sign?" by calling Canada a "gorgeous country". But, he warns his readers, if you're used to American road signs, written in English text, you'd better bone up [Would a Bostonian really use that expression? Ed.] on the amazing array of symbols Canucks use to communicate information to bilingual or multilingual road users. Like these.


"What began as a minor puzzlement for my wife and me bloomed over the course of a few days into a full-on obsession," he wrote of the various blue-and-white, black-and-yellow, French-and-English signs. "What in the name of Rob Ford were the road signs trying to tell us?"

Mr. Burr took the sign in the upper right corner to mean "Roadside genome sequencing booth just ahead". In fact, it's a signpost for the River Valley Scenic Drive. Poor Len Canayen, who alerted us to this story, admits that he didn't know that one either. Nor could he figure out the blue-and-white ones in the bottom row. Whatever could they mean? Don't ask Walt. Read Mr. Burr's column.

Sunday, August 24, 2014

Canuck cabinet ministers not really up for official bilingualism

A person who speaks many languages is multilingual.
A person who speaks two languages is bilingual.
A person who speaks only one language is... English!

That joke has been around for centuries. Of more recent vintage is the one about the southern Baptist preacher whose argument for having English as the only official language of the USA was "If English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for me!"

You hear a lot of such talk in Armerica, as the use of Spanish in day-to-day life spreads north and east, buoyed on the wave of immigrants (legal and otherwise) from south of the border. Those who insist that the USA should have only one official language -- English -- point to Canada as an example of the confusion and cost of bilingualism.

For those who don't know [most Americans. Ed.], Canada has two official languages -- English and French. Notice that I didn't say "national languages". That's because the word "national", common to both English and French, has slightly different meanings. The French "national" refers to ethnicity -- Frenchness -- and is thus a heavily loaded word in the multicultural mess that Canada has become.

But never mind. Bilingualism has been a principal policy of the Canadian government for half a century, and has given a certain style to all communication, written and oral, by public bodies and officials. The style is sometimes called "AirCanada-speak", from the days when AirCan was the national -- oops, can't say that -- the state-owned airline. Here's an example. "Veuillez boucler vos ceintures de sécurité, please fasten your seatbelts." -- all said in one breath. Which language would be spoken first depends on whether the closest city is in a French-speaking or English-speaking area. Really.

But that's the law in Canada! And there's even a Commissioner of Official Languages/Commissaire aux langues officielles to make sure that all public pronouncements are made in both languages. Not kidding. Check out his website.

Uttering platitudes in English and French simultaneously is no biggie for Canuck Prime Minister Steve Harpoon, whose dogged determination to learn the language on the other side of the corn flakes box has served him well. But some of his top cabinet minister apparently flunked high school French and can't be arsed to take remedial lessons.

Walt refers to "Johnboy" Baird and "Skinny Tony" Clement, who preside over the Foreign Affairs Ministry and Treasury Board respectively. Messrs Baird and Clement love to demonstrate their coolness and connectedness by Twittering and tweeting about this, that and the other. [Especially "the other", in the case of "Nancy" Baird. Ed.] But they do so mostly in English, since that's the only language in which they are more-or-less fluent. Too bad for them, because the language police are on their case!

Jason Fekete, writing in the Ottawa Citizen, tells us that the Commissioner of Official Languages is trying to determine whether cabinet ministers, on their personal Twitter accounts, have responsibilities under Canada’s language laws when tweeting on government business or posting information for their departments. "The outcome of the investigation, could put a chill on federal ministers’ use of social media and erode the spontaneity of communicating directly, in real time, with the public."

What do the ministers concerned have to say? One of the most government's most prolific tweetie-pies, Michelle Rempel, the Minister of State for Western Economic Diversification, told the Citizen, "My dept. is fully compliant (tweets in both languages) – as it should be. Press releases are the same. While my French is coming along nicely, and I have a great desire to be fully proficient in it, English is still my primary language and as such tweets from my personal account reflect the same."

Mr. Clement went a little farther, tweeting, "I think it’s a ridiculous waste of time. I sometimes tweet in French, much in English. If he [the Commissioner] proposes to overlord me [sic], I will quit Twitter." Dare we hope!

Walt's advice to all of them: If you can't write coherently in proper English, don't write at all. As Mark Twain said, "It is better to keep your mouth closed and let people think you are a fool than to open it and remove all doubt."

Friday, February 10, 2012

O ye of little faith!

Some of you were tempted to make mock of yesterday's advertisement by the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Montréal, urging the faithful to pray that the Montréal Canadiens -- "le CH" -- will squeak into the NHL playoffs. Well, did you see last night's game on the Island which is Long?

There can be no doubt that God heard and answered Habs fans' prayers. Scotty Gomez scored his first goal since February 5th ... 2011 .. and it proved to be the game-winner as les Glorieux triumphed over the Islanders 4-2.

Never doubt the power of prayer.

Tidbit of trivia: Why are the Canadiens known as "le CH"? It's because their logo looks like a giant C surrounding a smaller H. But in fact there are two C's, a red one inside a blue one. It's really "CHC", for "le Club de Hockey Canadien" or "Canadian Hockey Club". And someone thought that up before Canada became officially bilingual!

Monday, May 17, 2010

"I have a plan to destroy America"

Agent 6 has forwarded a 2004 speech by three-time Colorado governor Dick Lamm which has recently gone viral. Titled "I Have a Plan to Destroy America", it reflects on the dangers of multiculturalism and pandering to the minorities and the underclasses. It's longer than my usual posts, but pertinent excerpts are well worth reading, not just for Americans but for Canadians and Britons too.

Mr. Lamm was talking about Mexifornia, a book by Victor Davis Hanson, explaining how immigration - both legal and illegal - was destroying the entire state of California. He said it would march across the country until it destroyed all vestiges of The American Dream. Here's what Governor Lamm had to say:

"First, to destroy America, turn America into a bilingual or multi-lingual and bicultural country. History shows that no nation can survive the tension, conflict, and antagonism of two or more competing languages and cultures. It is a blessing for an individual to be bilingual; however, it is a curse for a society to be bilingual. The historical scholar, Seymour Lipset, put it this way: 'The histories of bilingual and bi-cultural societies that do not assimilate are histories of turmoil, tension, and tragedy.' Canada, Belgium, Malaysia, and Lebanon all face crises of national existence in which minorities press for autonomy, if not independence. Pakistan and Cyprus have divided. Nigeria suppressed an ethnic rebellion. France faces difficulties with Basques, Bretons, and Corsicans.

"Second, invent 'multiculturalism' and encourage immigrants to maintain their culture. I would make it an article of belief that all cultures are equal. That there are no cultural differences. I would make it an article of faith that the Black and Hispanic dropout rates are due solely to prejudice and discrimination by the majority. Every other explanation is out of bounds.

"Third, we could make the United States an 'Hispanic Québec' without much effort. The key is to celebrate diversity rather than unity. As Benjamin Schwarz said in the Atlantic Monthly recently: 'The apparent success of our own multiethnic and multicultural experiment might have been achieved not by tolerance but by hegemony. Without the dominance that once dictated ethnocentricity and what it meant to be an American, we are left with only tolerance and pluralism to hold us together.'

"I would encourage all immigrants to keep their own language and culture. I would replace the melting pot metaphor with the salad bowl metaphor. It is important to ensure that we have various cultural subgroups living in America enforcing their differences rather than as Americans, emphasizing their similarities.

"Fourth, I would make our fastest growing demographic group the least educated. I would add a second underclass, unassimilated, undereducated, and antagonistic to our population. I would have this second underclass have a 50% dropout rate from high. school.

"My fifth point for destroying America would be to get big foundations and business to give these efforts lots of money. I would invest in ethnic identity, and I would establish the cult of 'Victimology.' I would get all minorities to think that their lack of success was the fault of the majority. I would start a grievance industry blaming all minority failure on the majority population.

"My sixth plan for America's downfall would include dual citizenship and divided loyalties. I would celebrate diversity over unity. I would stress differences rather than similarities. Diverse people worldwide are mostly engaged in hating each other - that is, when they are not killing each other. A diverse, peaceful, or stable society is against most historical precedent. People undervalue the unity it takes to keep a nation together.

"Look at the ancient Greeks. The Greeks believed that they belonged to the same race; they possessed a common language and literature; and they worshipped the same gods. All Greece took part in the Olympic games. A common enemy, Persia, threatened their liberty. Yet all these bonds were not strong enough to overcome two factors: local patriotism and geographical conditions that nurtured political divisions. Greece fell. E Pluribus Unum -- From many, one. In that historical reality, if we put the emphasis on the 'pluribus' instead of the 'unum,' we will balkanize America as surely as Kosovo.

"Next to last, I would place all subjects off limits; make it taboo to talk about anything against the cult of 'diversity.' I would find a word similar to 'heretic' in the 16th century - that stopped discussion and paralyzed thinking in the 16th century. Words like 'racist' or 'xenophobe' halt discussion and debate.

"Having made America a bilingual/bicultural country, having established multi-culturism, having the large foundations fund the doctrine of 'Victimology,' I would next make it impossible to enforce our immigration laws. I would develop a mantra: Because immigration has been good for America, it must always be good. I would make every individual immigrant symmetric and ignore the cumulative impact of millions of them.

"Lastly, I would censor Victor Davis Hanson's book, Mexifornia. His book is dangerous. It exposes the plan to destroy America. If you feel America deserves to be destroyed, don't read that book."

I disagree with Mr. Lamm's (and Mr. Hanson's) thoughts on bilingualism. In western (meaning white) countries, it can be made to work. Canada, Belgium and Switzerland come to mind. Yet it cannot be denied that Canada and Belgium are periodically wracked be fierce debates and divisions about "distinct societies" and special rights for minority language and cultural groups.

I agree wholeheartedly with Mr. Lamm's comment on free speech. In the culture of political correctness that infects the USA, Canada and Britain today, we can no longer call a spade a spade. Anyone who tells the truth about the problems caused in our society by certain ethnic groups is immediately labelled a "xenophobe" or "racist" or "fascist". There is nothing more intolerant than a self-righteous liberal!

The West is in huge trouble, drowning in a tsunami of multiculturalism and political correctness. Future historians will surely write that our tolerance was our downfall.

Monday, March 1, 2010

How many languages is enough?

Let me declare my bias at the outset. I believe in official bilingualism, or even multilingualism for those countries in which there are enough speakers of "minority languages" to warrant it. If you've got 20 or 25 or 30 or 40 percent of the population who speak a language other than that of the majority, their language needs and deserves recognition or protection.

It's a good principle, based on equity and in most cases history. But in practice, it tends to get a bit messy, especially when the number of official languages rises to three or more. Switzerland has four official languages, not including English which does not have official status. In South Africa they went from two (English and Afrikaans) to (I think) nine. India has 15...I think. It's a Babel out there!

The trouble starts when you try to make sure that everything "official" is done in both languages, as they do in Canada. I was reminded of this watching the closing ceremonies of the Olympics yesterday. Here are a couple of paragraphs from today's Canadian Press report.

Organizers promised they wouldn't try to shoehorn in more French to appease critics who said the opening ceremonies were too English-centric. But there was, in fact, more French-language content, some of which didn't feel accidental.

Avila, Yanofsky and Derek Miller joined forces on "Let's Have a Party," which featured French and English lyrics, Furlong struggled through a bit of rough French at the top of his speech and sprinkled more throughout. Lavigne and Fox both exited the stage by announcing "Merci beaucoup."


"Furlong" is the chairman of VANOC, the Vancouver games organizing committee. Listening to him mispronounce the few lines of French which had been written for him was painful. I felt embarrassed for him. But no English-speaking Canadian politician would dare read an entire speech without trying to get out a couple of words in "the other language".

So also we have the crazy debate about which language to sing the national anthem in. The lyrics for "O Canada" were originally written in French. The words are very beautiful, also quite Catholic and chauvinistic, with references to carrying the sword and the cross. Loyal Orangemen can't stand those words!

There have been two or three English versions written since, with nice but quite different words, including "our home and native land", which is objected to (so they say) by immigrants. The political correctness just gets worse and worse.

What is sung now at events like the Olympic closing ceremonies or an Ottawa Senators hockey game is hodgepodge of a couple of lines of English, then a couple of lines of French, and some more English. It leaves even the reasonably bilingual about a half-note behind the music, because everyone is waiting to hear which language the next guy is going to sing!

I mention this as food for thought to American readers. Pressure is building in the USA to recognize Spanish as an official language, at least in some of the southwestern states. If that happens, who's going to write new lyrics for "The Star-Spangled Banner"? And can we be patient during official ceremonies while, as in Canada, everything is said first in one language and then in the other?

Official bilingualism sorely tests our brotherly love. To avoid coming to blows, people do not need to learn a second language, but they do need to learn to be tolerant of others.