Dr Taylor Marshall's videos have been featured on WWW many times. Usually he talks about the crisis in the Roman Catholic Church. This time it's different. For the first time anywhere (as nearly as Ed. can tell), Dr Marshall makes the connection between the FBI raid on Mar-a-Lago, President Trump's Floriday residence, and the Jeffrey Epstein sex scandal!
The connection is this. The judge who approved the unprecedented raid has been named (by left-learning Politico, no less!) as Bruce Reinhart, who worked as a federal prosecutor until 1 January 2008. A day later he became a defence attorney representing employees and clients of Jeffrey "Pedo" Epstein, the convicted pimp and pervert.
It comes down to this. President Trump said he would drain the swamp -- the Deep State which controls the real US government. He didn't swing the axe fast enough or deep enough. They are still there, giving a pass to those they like (Hello, Hunter Biden!) and doing their damndest to cancel those they don't, like President Trump.
Christians! You are the light of the world and the salt of the earth. As Dr Marshall says, "Go out there and be salty!"
In case you haven't noticed, there's a new politically correct curseword, used by liberals and wokesters to condemn anything that they don't like or that runs contrary to their agenda. The word is "unacceptable".
Readers who remember last winter's Freedom Convoy will recall Blackie McBlackface, Prime Minister of Canuckistan, saying that the protesters, demanding freedom from vax mandates and other government intrustions in their lives, were merely "a fringe minority holding unacceptable views."
"Unacceptable views", is it? "Unacceptable views?" I could see actions being unacceptable -- farting in church, for example. But views? You mean we're not allowed to think for ourselves any more? "Unacceptable" by whose standards? Are we talking about political correctness here, the sort of thing John Cleese decried in the interview posted here yesterday?
Ever since (perhaps just because I've been listening for it), I've noticed that increasing frequency with which politicians and the lickspittle media use the U-word -- Unacceptable -- to describe any thing, person, action or thought which they don't like.
The latest example to come to my attention was the reaction of the mayor of Cincinnati OH, to the latest manifestation of the Summer of Rage, which occurred early today. At least nine people were wounded -- none critically -- in a shooting outside the Mr. Pitiful bar, in the Ohio city’s Over-the-Rhine district, a popular nightlife area.
Another shooting in the neighbouring Central Business District left two wounded, but Inspector Gadget of the Cincinnati PD said it was unclear whether the two shootings were related.
Mayor Aftab Karma Singh Pureval [Really, that's his name. Ed.] called the gunfire not just "unacceptable" but "completely and totally unacceptable."
So there. I fully expect that the hoodlums [Note that Walt didn't use any unacceptable nouns. Ed.] guilty of that kind of anti-social behaviour will cease and desist forthwith, now that they know it's "unacceptable". Selah.
When one of my favourite political writers -- the one who called Donald Trump the "insane clown president" -- likens Justin Trudeau to Nicolae Ceauşescu, the late Communist dictator of Romania, I take notice. And that's what Matt Taibbi did in his Substack blog TK News yesterday. Under the headline "Justin Trudeau's Ceauşescu Moment" is the subhead "Denouncing truckers for 'unacceptable views,' Canada's Prime Minister skipped town rather than face evidence of his own unpopularity. Is neoliberalism finally cracking?"
For those who have forgotten, Nicolae Ceauşescu was President of Romania from 1974 to 1989.
His second decade was characterized by an increasingly erratic personality cult, nationalism and a deterioration in foreign relations with the Western powers as well as the Soviet Union. In December of 1989, in the face of something like the Canadian truckers' freedom rally in the city of Timișoara, the Communists gathered a rent-a-mob in Bucharest to show their presumed support for the régime. Then this happened.
For three minutes (2:45 to 5:45) the crowd shouts insults and deprecations at the President. (I don't understaned Romanian, so am not sure if the F-word was used or not.) Mr Ceauşescu offers the people a generous bribe -- a 10% increase in the minimum wage -- to be quiet and cease their opposition. And he urges them to rise up to defend Romania against the intervention of "foreign agents".
"Better to die in battle, in full glory than to once again be slaves upon your ancient ground, and we must fight to live free and independent!" Someone in the crowd responds, "He's right. Let's rush the stage!"
Even if you don't understand Romanian, you can hear that at about the 8-minute mark of this video (the second part of his speech) people are starting to shout back at the Communist dictator. Just before the clip ends, you can see him waving his hands in gestures that clearly say "no, no, no! I don't want to hear that!" After this speech he ran away, but was caught and was executed four days later, still wearing the same clothes.
I would be surprised if Blackie McBlackface knew anything about the Communist tyrant's fall from power, but he has smart people pulling his strings, who certainly advised him that it was better to go to ground -- an "undisclosed location" in the Laurentians? -- rather than risk a similar confrontation with Canadians who were already waving "Fuck Trudeau!" flags on Parliament Hill.
That's Matt Taibbi's point. For neoliberalism or "liberal democracy", the bloom is off the rose. The real people (as distinguished from the liberal elites who rule Ottawa, Washington, Paris and London) are fed up. But, just like Ceaușescu, the rulers don't want to admit or even hear that. Mr Taibbi writes:
There may be no real-world comparison between a blood-soaked monster like Ceaușescu and a bumbling ball-scratcher like Joe Biden [I love that phrase!], or an honorarium-gobbling technocrat like Hillary Clinton [that one too!], or a Handsome Dan investment banker like Emmanuel Macron, or an effete pseudo-intellectual like Justin Trudeau.
Still, the ongoing inability of these leaders to see the math of populist uprisings absolutely recalls that infamous scene in Bucharest. From Brexit to the election of Donald Trump to, now, the descent of thousands of Canadian truckers upon the capital city of Ottawa to confront Trudeau, a consistent theme has been the refusal to admit — not even to us, but to themselves — the numerical truth of what they’re dealing with.
Trudeau is becoming the ultimate example. Truckers last month began protesting a January 22nd rule that required the production of vaccine passports before crossing the U.S.-Canadian border. Canadian truckers are reportedly 90% vaccinated, above the country’s 78% total, a key detail that’s been brazenly ignored by media in both countries determined to depict these more as “anti-vax” than “anti-mandate” protests (which seem to be about many things at once, but that’s another story).
When an angry convoy descended upon the capital, Trudeau dismissed them in a soliloquy that can only be described as inspired political arson:
The small fringe minority of people who are on their way to Ottawa, who are holding unacceptable views that they are expressing, do not represent the views of Canadians…who know that following the science and stepping up to protect each other is the best way to ensure our rights, our freedoms, our values as a country.
A near-exact repeat of the “basket of deplorables” episode, Trudeau’s imperious description of “unacceptable” views instantly became a rallying cry, with people across the country lining the streets to cheer truckers while self-identifying as the “small fringe minority.” Everyone from high school kids to farmers and teachers and random marchers carrying jerrycans of fuel joined in as Trudeau’s own words were used to massively accelerate his troubles.
I'm tempted to copy and paste the rest of Mr Taibbi's article but imagine I'd hear from his lawyers. Suffice to say that he has hit the liberal nail right on its pointy head. The people are speaking. Will the liberal elites listen? They'd better, lest they wind up like Mr Ceaușescu.
Once again, Michael Matt, editor of The Remnant newspaper, has created a video that was immediately banned by YouTube, for "violating community guidelines". Fortunately, the latest episode of Remnant Underground, titled "Freedom, eh? Canada Leads the World", is available on Remnant TV. With tongue stuck firmly in cheek, Mr Matt asks for your help in figuring out what it was that got him censored (again) by the leftie social media giant.
YouTube says he was "violating World Health Organization guidelines on social distancing and self-isolation." See if you can figure out which part of the video they're referring to. Was it:
* the clip of Justin Trudeau's brother exposing the Mr Socks as a globalist stooge of Davos?
* his full-throated support of the Canadian truckers' Freedom Convoy, now in its second week of peaceful protest in Ottawa?
* his attack on Jorge Bergoglio, the man who calls himself Pope Francis?
* his interview with Father John Echert, the Parking Lot Priest?
Is a puzzlement! Please watch the video and tell your friends and family that although the "YouTube Gestapo" has shut Michael Matt down again, they can find all his videos on Remnant TV. And watch this very timely episode right here on WWW.
It seems pretty obvious that Michael Matt is succeeding in ticking off the lickspittle media and their (((masters))). God bless him, and, really, stay tuned!
